State Rep. Kim Williams sent this along ~

There are two important updates regarding the Enrollment Preference Task Force:
1. The November meeting, scheduled for this Wednesday, November 20^th, has been cancelled. The Department of Justice is still working on answering the legal questions that were submitted on October 22^nd, 2013.
2. The December meeting, scheduled for Thursday, December 12^th, will need to be rescheduled due to a double-booking by Buena Vista. We are currently working on getting a new December date, and we will send out a notice once the new date is confirmed. The University of Delaware’s Institute for Public Administration may be joining us at the December meeting.

Enrollment Preference Task Force: First and Second Meetings
September 26 was the first meeting of the Enrollment Preference Task Force created by House Bill 90 with the second meeting taking place on October 24. The task force is examining the following issues related to school choice:
Best practices for application process;
Choice opportunities in Kent and Sussex counties;
Resources and emergency procedures for students with disabilities;
Best practices to ensure equal access;
Extending outreach regarding choice options;
Examine impact of choice program on rest of public education system;
For more information including the complete task force schedule, please visit http://legis.delaware.gov/LIS/TaskForces.nsf/ and click “The Enrollment Preference Task Force” link.

Here is a link to the documents. Delaware's Public Meeting Calendar site would not allow us to upload the files, too many of them, they are now on the legislative site.

http://legis.delaware.gov/LIS/TaskForces.nsf/113411bdd5de74d385257b3b005e343c/49b267f532b422d185257b6c0061a658?OpenDocument&TableRow=1.5.2#1.5.

Here is a link to the remaining items: Washington Post article, HB 90, information about the National Alliance for Public Schools, and their report on the states "Clear Student Recruitment, Enrollment and Lottery Procedures."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/02/16/how-charter-schools-choose-desirable-students/

http://www.legis.delaware.gov/LIS/LIS147.NSF/vwLegislation/HB+90?Opendocument

http://www.publiccharters.org/About-Us.aspx

http://www.publiccharters.org/About-Charter-Schools.aspx

http://www.publiccharters.org/law/ViewComponent.aspx?comp=15

Let me know if you need anything else.

Read all of 'The Enrollment Preference Task Force' Minutes, Reports and Information HERE

Plus, some Delaware blog posts ~

HB 90 task force members named; first meeting September 26

Enrollment Preference Task Force Meeting #2

How Delaware Charter Schools Wean Out Blacks And The Poor

Mike O. writes ~ Does your momma pick watermelons?

Last night the HB 90 task force began to sharpen its focus, taking a look at specific information charters and VoTechs request on their admission applications. Co-chair Kim Williams read out a list of questions she had gathered from actual applications.
When read out loud the whole list seemed to go on and on, with each question odder and more inappropriate than the last. Jaws dropped when she read: “has a parent or guardian worked on a farm, in the fields or in a factory with fruits, vegetables or animals; has the parent or guardian every worked with watermelons, potatoes, mushrooms, corn, apples, chicken, or shellfish,”. Remember, this is information parents must provide in order to be considered for admission. Here’s the whole list:
The questions that were asked on the applications: race of a student, specifically if the student was Hispanic/Latino, student’s social security number, photo id, IEP or 504 Plan, citizenship, what languages are spoken in the home, place of birth, place of parent’s employment, health problems, parents married, separated, has your child repeated a grade, where does the child live: with both parents, mother, father, grandmother; does your child receive services: inclusion, occupational therapy, hearing support, speech therapy, or counseling; does your child take medication, wear glasses or wear a hearing aid; has a parent or guardian worked on a farm, in the fields or in a factory with fruits, vegetables or animals; has the parent or guardian every worked with watermelons, potatoes, mushrooms, corn, applies, chicken, or shellfish; has your family changed homes in the last three years? Schools asking parents if they need transportation. Please check if your student has any area of interest in these sports. What ways do you feel that this school will serve your child?
Copies of the items requested on the application: birth certificate, copy of the parent or students social security card, medical records, proof of residence, most recent report card etc.
Once the discussion resumed, the charter and VoTech representatives were unfazed and were full of justifications why their school needed extra information. But then Rep. Williams asked “That’s fine, but why do you need that information BEFORE the admission decision has been made? Why can’t you collect it AFTER admission?” And the silence was deafening.
You might think that requiring a common application form would solve these kinds of issues. Kilroy has the form; go take a look.
The problem is although charters, VoTechs and magnet schools are required to use the common form, they are still allowed to ask whatever supplemental questions they want. All they have to do is staple the common form on the front of the supplemental questions, and they are compliant. Even on the online application, the supplemental information were just added “as is” with no questions asked. Nobody is checking to see if the supplemental questions are fair or even legal.
One of the dodges offered by the charter folks was “That information is not used in the admission decision,” and sometimes it says so right on the application. But I’m not impressed. As Rep. Williams noted, “Most applications state that you must return all items requested, if you do not, your application will not be processed.”
I say the surest way to make sure information isn’t misused is to not collect it in the first place.
The discussion went around for a while longer, but didn’t get much further, which is fine because the issue had at least been unmistakably laid on the table.
The problem is asking these questions will remain legal until some parent challenges them, which leaves enforcement up to parents, probably only after a denial. That is wrong. It is an opportunity for leadership from the Department of Education or our district leaders.
So as the task force moves toward its directive of producing recommendations this January, here’s an idea: An application should not contain any questions that exceed your charter (or whatever documented admission criteria they use). If it’s not in your charter, it’s not on your application. That would be a piece of real charter/VpTech reform that can be accomplished within the scope of the Enrollment Preferences task force.